Hot Issue

Home / binance / cyclean / A Third Person’s Perspective of the CyClean vs. Binance Incident

A Third Person’s Perspective of the CyClean vs. Binance Incident

8월 10, 2018 ,




Many of you are seeking answers to the CyClean and Binance happening that has been receiving worldwide attention recently. CyClean does too. We are an honest project that has only stayed faithful to research, community management, and business expansion. Today, we want to lay down the facts as they are. The following is a timeline of events.


Timeline of Events
  • August 1st – CyClean announces Binance listing through press releases
  • August 2nd – Binance’s Arim Jeon requests that the press deny the listing and revise articles
  • August 5th – Binance reaches second agreement -> CyClean reveals agreement on official Twitter account
  • August 6th – The official date on which listing was to be announced according to agreement
  • August 7th – Official date of listing according to agreement
  • August 7th (evening) – He Yi, co-founder of Binance, calls CyClean’s agreement fake, going as far as to accuse CyClean of being a scam coin on Twitter
  • August 8th – CyClean responds by disclosing the actual agreement, He Yi deletes tweet calling CyClean a scam coin and changes her stance to say CyClean was the victim of a scam
  • August 9th – CyClean discloses emails of the process and makes an official statement with 9 points requesting that Binance’s Changpeng Zhao respond
  • August 10th – Changpeng Zhao tweets twice about helping victims of scams, which we interpret as being directed towards us, given the current state of affairs

While the CyClean team is assessing the problem and is actively pursuing a solution, the Binance team has not given an official statement. As we are waiting, the Internet community has raised its voice about this issue.

A Naver Blogger’s Perspective
One blogger who goes by the name “Chorokee” summarizes the incident for readers. First, the writer recalls Binance’s recent hack and now mentions Binance’s involvement in this listing case as another hot topic in cryptocurrency communities in Korea. Upon narrating the events, the poster highlights details that he finds confusing. If Binance had reached a listing agreement with CyClean, how is it that only a few members of the Binance team know about it, while others don’t? This does not seem right for a cryptocurrency exchange that is often called the number one exchange in the world.

The writer goes on to state his position. This person is watching from a third-person’s perspective and finds it fishy that Binance is not making an official announcement through its channels. As more evidence from CyClean surfaces, the blogger is more inclined to believe CyClean, as CyClean is more transparent than Binance in handling this matter. The blogger concludes by expressing their best for the CyClean project and for this matter to be taken care of as soon as possible.

You can find the original Korean post here:
https://blog.naver.com/rmsgh0422/221335955957

As you just read, people are expressing their views online, and it seems like they are siding with us. CyClean will continue to remain forthcoming until this situation is resolved, and we hope you see the truth of this matter. Thank you.