Hot Issue

CyClean Asks Binance and Zhao: What People Think of the CyClean and Binance Incident Part 2

Cryptocurrency enthusiasts around the world are showing significant interest in the developments of the CyClean listing on Binance case. One of members of a Naver café, which are online Korean communities that deal with a certain theme, writes of their thoughts on the CyClean vs. Binance happening. Here’s what the author says.

First, the writer remembers CyClean’s announcement of its Binance listing last Wednesday. CyClean had revealed the news through online news sources. However, within a week, Binance denied this fact. The café member who wrote the post admits that he/she was disappointed on CyClean. This person felt betrayed. Did CyClean leak false information to its investors?

But after some thinking and observing the situation, this person came to conclude that CyClean did not lie. There are many reasons for this, according to the writer.

First, CyClean is showing a strong will to proceed with legal action. CyClean even posted a picture of the agreement online! You can clearly see CZ’s signature on the line, but Binance is denying this. You can only guess how flabbergasted CyClean is feeling now.


Second, CyClean paid all of the listing appropriate fees, both in Bitcoin and in Ethereum. Binance proceeded to call CyClean a scam, but a little later, Binance retreated a little and suggested that the email was hacked or something. The writer asked this question: How can cryptocurrency projects trust the world’s number one exchange if they cannot beat one hacker?



Also, CyClean revealed all information about the emails that were exchanged with the official email of Binance. The writer also points out CZ’s behavior when dealing with similar cases. Mentioning the rumors of Binance’s partnership with Chain Partners, the author remembers the way CZ responded. He left a powerful message on Twitter, but with CyClean, he seems to be hiding. Could it be that he has something to hide?

Because of what happened recently with CyClean and Binance, the writer believes that CyClean has lost a lot of credibility, which will definitely hurt the project. Despite CyClean being the victim, it seems unfair.

You can find the link to the cafe here:
https://cafe.naver.com/withsarang/114069

And that’s the story of one café member in Korea. But there’s more. A twitter user by the name of @FrankoCurrency shares the exact same thoughts.


This person also raises several questions that remain unanswered, and he gives three options. It could be that CZ is lying, that someone hacked Binance’s servers, or a rogue employee is on the loose. 

It seems like people all over the world are curious to know the truth of this situation. There are too many inconsistencies in this case.

We at CyClean are working day and night to resolve this situation, and thanks to our supporters, word is getting out. CyClean wants to once again request that Binance give an official statement and help us find an answer, together. That is what the world’s number one cryptocurrency exchange should do.